Search:

Type: Posts; User: Bruno_du_13; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Audiomagnate, Thank you for your interest! I...

    Audiomagnate,
    Thank you for your interest! I will post pics and measurement plots when I will find some time - unfortunately not so easy at the moment.

    It's always a pleasure to speak with JBL...
  2. Hlaari, In fact I bought a pair of JBL SRX738...

    Hlaari,

    In fact I bought a pair of JBL SRX738 5 years ago. I kept the same crossover points (350Hz and 2kHz) but fully active, tri-amped (and EQ'd/time aligned).
    ...
  3. Thank you for your responses. Pos: I do not...

    Thank you for your responses.

    Pos: I do not want 2269... very large moving mass and low efficiency, 2242 (and 2268) are far better for me. Prefering good 35Hz response "kicky" transducer rather...
  4. OK thanks. So probably a problem of Neodym...

    OK thanks. So probably a problem of Neodym availaibility / price.

    Did anyone heard those 2242 and the 2268 too? I guess both were used on HLA subwoofers, primary the 2242 then the 2268. It would...
  5. Hi, As it seems not so easy to find the...

    Hi,

    As it seems not so easy to find the response, I sent this thread also in diyaudio.com

    If the 2242 is significantly better at souding or measuring, I will replace my 2268. Since it costs...
  6. JBL SRX/STX series: 18" 2268 out, return to the 2242 or go with the 2279

    Hi,

    A question I have about recent 18" JBL units:

    In the rather recent serie SRX, there was the sub 728 and the full-way 738 using the 18" driver 2268H, a neodym double-differential driver....
Results 1 to 6 of 6