Thanks Giskard/4313B/Techbot for posting this information.
http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...ad.php?t=21501
Printable View
Thanks Giskard/4313B/Techbot for posting this information.
http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...ad.php?t=21501
In this attractive speaker:
If only my Japanese were better than zero.
You're welcome!
5th photo down
http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/s...54&postcount=2
http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/s...58&postcount=3
And to think those beauties are sitting 30 miles from my house and I can't buy them. :(
Thanks for reconnecting me to those links. I'd completely forgotten.
The tech sheet says it uses the LE14H-3. So it was changed to LE14H-4 later.
http://manuals.harman.com/JBL/HOM/Te...S4600%20ts.pdf
4313B, what is the main differnece between the -3 and -4?
Yeah, looks like a sensitivity thing.
They got 2-3 dB more output.
We discussed this sensitivity tradeoff with the Array 1400 if I remember correctly.
Marketing?
Arrr, just buy a bigger amp!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guido
JBL really needs to make this system available in North America.Quote:
Originally Posted by 4313B
.
... Europe too. I could convince my wife presumably. :)
10 - 15 less grams, does this change the bass frequency response significantly?
To be more concrete: Is there an audible difference between the woofers of the Array 1400 and the S4600?. (I had the chance to listen to an Array 1400 some time ago.)
___________
Peter
Thanks for posting the S4600 info in the Technical Reference: System Info area.
It begs the question of comparison with the 1400 Array.
I was told that there is zero market for it in the U.S. and that it would not be available. I suspect that may be due to the lighter bottom end as compared with something like the 1400 Array.