1 Attachment(s)
Therre is no right or wrong Polarity...
Hey, alle...
to wit:
The attached is excerpted from the S120PII brochure (JBL S120PSII Powered Subwoofer Link) and speaks to phasing wrt the sub-woofer.
Since the sub emphasizes the lower frequencies, it might be desireable to have it out-of-phase from the LF transducer's. Being in-phase with the LF's might create too much doubling in the area of frequency "overlap" (i.e., between the LF's and sub) making a muddy sound, or a sound with simply too much LF, and not enough ULF. You might get better reproduction of the ULF's with the sub out-of-phase from the LF's.
So, not specifically on-topic with your question, but relevant to phasing non-the-less.
The L36 / Polarity Thread
It's kinda quiet out here - some kinda wake or something...? Me too.
Well, I'll toss myself into the ring, back on the tired-old discussion of transducer polarity...
What follows is a most interesting passage - this may (or not... ;) ) confim my suspicion, posted just above.
The following passage lies within a discussion of the bass-reflex enclosure, and how the "entrapped air volume of the enclosure is used as an extension of the cone to move a volume of air trapped in a port ... approximately equal to the area (sic) of the air displaced by the front of the cone."
"One popular misconception regarding phase inverters is that as the frequency decreases, the front radiation from the cone becomes less, and all the acoustic power heard emerges from the port. Actually, the very best that can ever be achieved would be approximately equal outputs from the port area and from the front of the cone, inasmuch as radiations from the port are directly related to the movement of the cone." The authors go on to opine "there is slightly less acoustical power from the port area as compared to the front of the cone because some energy is lost via absorption inside the enclosure", but they offer no supporting data.
Interesting. I don't know the researchers or their views of transducer polarity, but the underlined fragment addresses my suspicion that JBL might have held this so-called "misconception" (authors' word), that the cone's use of the cabinet entrapped air increases the reproduction of low-frequencies and the overall efficiency of the LF transducer to do so (in this most difficult area of frequency response), and therefore the JBL polarity convention was negative.
Me? I've kinda cottoned-on to the "misconception" and to JBL polarity. Negative is Good :D
from: Badmaieff, A. and Davis, D., 1988, How to build speaker enclosures, p54 (Bass-Relfex or Phase-inversion enclosures)
OK, back to the wake :confused: