PBN M2!5 vs M2: anybody heard them?

[iansr]

Just wondering if anyone has heard these PBN speakers that use the M2 CD and waveguide? Interested to know how they compare.

[martin_wu99]

Just wondering if anyone has heard these PBN speakers that use the M2 CD and waveguide? Interested to know how they compare.
No pixels no truth

[grumpy]

There’s a thread here already somewhere, but here’s a link:

https://pbnaudio.com/m25-loudspeaker/ (https://pbnaudio.com/m25-loudspeaker/)

[martin_wu99]

There’s a thread here already somewhere, but here’s a link:

https://pbnaudio.com/m25-loudspeaker/ (https://pbnaudio.com/m25-loudspeaker/)
Does anyone here audition them?:blink:

[sebackman]

I have heard them compared to 4367. Not even the same planet.



Does anyone here audition them?:blink:

[iansr]

I have heard them compared to 4367. Not even the same planet.
The 4367s are better?

[martin_wu99]

The 4367s are better?
Sebackman meant M25 is far more better than 4367:bouncy:

[johnlcnm]

Sebackman meant M25 is far more better than 4367:bouncy:
I would be surprised if the archaic 2235H blew away the 2216ND! Especially in the lower midrange.

[sebackman]

They don’t. They did not use the 2234. They did not make them 2.5 way either, both 15 goes all the way. Well, or they don’t....

[ngccglp]

I have not heard the PBN, but just by looking at the specs :

1. Crossing 2 x 2235H at 900 hz.

Always thought the 2235H is excellent for bass extension. Using 2 in parallel crossing so high might affect the clarity in the mid bass. I think it is wise that they are arranged vertically too and not horizontally.