PDA

View Full Version : Field Guide to the JBL 10 inch Midbass driver 2121 2122 2123



hjames
05-31-2007, 08:11 PM
One of the magical things about the 4340/41, 4343 and 4345 Monitors is the 10 inch Midbass driver. This driver helps the big woofer (15 or 18") handle just the really low notes, and keeps the horn/compression driver from having to go below its optimal range.

Here's a thread showing how Infredible redid the surrounds on a pair of those ultra-rare 2121s - http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=3527 (http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=3527)

In an older thread, (http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2177&postcount=11)Giskard said

The 4343 uses the alnico 2121 and the 4343B uses the SFG ferrite 2121H. Both have the 4" inverted paper dust cover.

The 4344 and 4345 use the newer 2122H which has a harder 3" dust cap. It is less susceptible to break-up.

All of them use a 3-inch edgewound copper ribbon voice coil.
*****
"Isn't this inconsistent with what we would normally use above 300Hz? I would assume aluminum would be desired due to the lightness and quick response at the higher frequencies."

Sure, it just wasn't in the cards way back then. The newer 2123H uses an aluminum voice coil.

Thanks for that info, G!

One thing thats a problem for modern fans is that the original model 2121 driver is unavailable. It was replaced by the model 2122 - which is rapidly getting near impossible to find as well. You can occasionally find a replacement cone (as of May 2007) for a rebuild, but even they are in quite short supply.
Some folks have substituted the model 2123 driver - but its not equivalent, its more efficient (higher output levels), and has a different response curve that the earlier 2 drivers. You'd need to re-design the crossover and, frankly, its just not the same driver.
But some folks do like it.



Thanks to Subwoof for these amazing pictures!

The Lineup up basic JBL 10 Inchs

At the bottom -
For those who can read the design specs - here's a chart Giskard has posted numerous time showing the different parameters.

hjames
05-31-2007, 08:13 PM
Thanks again to Subwoof for these amazing pictures!

The Voicecoil comparison
2121 on the Top
2122 in the Middle
2123 below

hjames
05-31-2007, 08:31 PM
Yet again, thanks to Subwoof for these pictures!

Comparison of the magnet structure

2121 beside the 2121H

2122H beside a picture of my 2123H driver (now in Maui)

(Sorry for the dissimilar style of the 2123 picture, but I know there is enough interest that it was worth including)

4313B
05-31-2007, 09:20 PM
Just a quick note that the LE10A in the photo is sporting the wrong dust cap (might even be an LE10H-1 recone kit in it).
It used the same dust cap as the 2121 next to it.

hjames
06-01-2007, 08:40 AM
Did JBL ever publish a response curve for the 2122H? I can't find it...


I posted it somewhere.

Right here, G -
and X_X - the forum search tool is your friend!
2122H - http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=10637

Fangio
06-29-2009, 02:10 PM
early 2121 with lansaloy surround.

ivica
01-02-2011, 02:46 PM
Thanks again to Subwoof for these amazing pictures!

The Voicecoil comparison
2121 on the Top
2122 in the Middle
2123 below

Very instructive photos, difficult to find .
Do you have the same photos of the voice coil for E110 and K110.
It would be interesting to see the difference of the coils

1audiohack
01-02-2011, 04:28 PM
The voice coil and spider on the E110 looks just like the 2121 pictured, VC is 0.300" tall, the cone is only 0.014" thick. By comparison the 2123's VC is 0.440" tall and the cone is about 0.024" thick. I don't have a 2122 kit to look at.

hjames
01-02-2011, 04:48 PM
Thanks again to Subwoof for these amazing pictures!

The Voicecoil comparison
2121 on the Top
2122 in the Middle
2123 below
Very instructive photos, difficult to find .
Do you have the same photos of the voice coil for E110 and K110.
It would be interesting to see the difference of the coils

The Pix on the 10 inch series were primarily from Subwoof -

>> Thanks to Subwoof for these amazing pictures!

subwoof
01-02-2011, 06:25 PM
If I remember, the K110 and E110 had the same coils but the former changed a few times on the "E" which made for a slightly different spec.

I don't have any of those open or kits to compare at the moment BUT I think I have some pretty rare K110-4 kits in storage. When it thaws I will look.

sub

ivica
01-30-2011, 06:38 AM
The voice coil and spider on the E110 looks just like the 2121 pictured, VC is 0.300" tall, the cone is only 0.014" thick. By comparison the 2123's VC is 0.440" tall and the cone is about 0.024" thick. I don't have a 2122 kit to look at.

Thanks for info,

1.
so concerning the VC differences - thickness and length, are they all 8-ohms VC for three ( E110, 2121 2123), or 16 ohms
2.
do you have any experience about re-coning E110 basket with 2123 re-cone kit

1audiohack
01-30-2011, 09:16 AM
Yes, the last six I assembled were E110 baskets with C8R2123H kits.

To clarify, thickness I made reference to is the cone material of the radiating element, not the voice coil or former.

The dimensions of a 2123H coil and former are approximately 2.995" I.D., former and wire combined thickness 0.028" and wound coil height 0.440".

E110H about 2.995" I.D., former and coil combined thickness 0.022" and wound wire height 0.285"

Hope this helps.
Barry.

ivica
01-31-2011, 01:10 AM
Yes, the last six I assembled were E110 baskets with C8R2123H kits.

To clarify, thickness I made reference to is the cone material of the radiating element, not the voice coil or former.

The dimensions of a 2123H coil and former are approximately 2.995" I.D., former and wire combined thickness 0.028" and wound coil height 0.440".

E110H about 2.995" I.D., former and coil combined thickness 0.022" and wound wire height 0.285"

Hope this helps.
Barry.

Many, many thanks,

So I understand that I can put re-cone kit for 2123 without any modification into E110 basket.
Is there any large differences in the sound between E110 and 2123 (after re-conning)??

1audiohack
01-31-2011, 08:30 AM
The E110 / 2123 basket / motor assemblies are identical. A 2123 kit in a E110 basket will be a proper 2123, except for the foil cal.

All the best,
Barry.

grumpy
01-31-2011, 09:08 AM
...
Is there any large differences in the sound between E110 and 2123 (after re-conning)??

I would expect so, partly depending on how they are used; in a system or standalone:

http://www.audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?29742-2123
http://www.audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?10635-E110-8

ivica
02-14-2011, 07:53 AM
I would expect so, partly depending on how they are used; in a system or standalone:

http://www.audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?29742-2123
http://www.audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?10635-E110-8

Many thanks, so with overlaying responses of 2123 and E-110 I get the following.
That would be some helpful for network changes if E110 is used in to say 4343 or 4345

ivica
09-07-2011, 08:19 AM
Many thanks, so with overlaying responses of 2123 and E-110 I get the following.
That would be some helpful for network changes if E110 is used in to say 4343 or 4345
Added 2122 response.
But all of responses are so called 'small signal responses'. On higher power I do believe that they are
much different.
It would be nice if such measurements somebody can add.